The evidence supporting this protocol is provided by a an open-label, single-arm study conducted by Spencer et al. involving 40 patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma between February 2001 and April 2002. Patients were given vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each treatment cycle with filgrastim (VGF) given on days 2 to 7 and either day 9 or 10 until the absolute neutrophil count was >10 x 109/L on one day or >1.0 x 109/L on two consecutive days after the expected chemotherapy-induced nadir. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days and four cycles were planned.r
Primary efficacy end-points were the early response rate (ERR) after two cycles of chemotherapy and overall response rate (ORR) after completion of four cycles of treatment. This study has shown VGF can be safely given in an ambulatory care setting and is efficacious against a range of advanced lymphoma subtypes (including NHL and HL).r
More recently, Pasricha et al. conducted a phase II study to evaluate the effectiveness of vinorelbine and gemcitabine based chemotherapy in the ambulatory, salvage setting against lymphoma. 90 patients were enrolled between December 2002 and December 2004 through 10 centres around Australia. Group 1 and 3 risk adjusted patients to receive VGF (vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, dexamethasone 16 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, pegfilgrastim on day 9 with 4 cycles planned) and Group 2 patients received FGIV (addition of ifosfamide 3 g/m2 on day 1 to VGF) every 21 days. Four cycles were planned for all groups.r
The results of this study showed vinorelbine and gemcitabine based chemotherapy is effective in the salvage setting against lymphoma and can be administered in an ambulatory setting.r
Furthermore, a multicenter study by Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group involving 22 patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 mcg/kg was administered subcutaneously on days 3 to 6 and 10 to 16 of each treatment cycle.r
The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy as well as toxicity for patients with relapsed of refractory DLBCL. The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine was effective and well-tolerated with minimal toxicity, and all patients were treated on an outpatient basis.r
A search of the literature found limited evidence to support the use of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in the treatment of lymphoma. The expert reference panel supported publication of the protocol on the basis of the information summarised below.
Source |
Study & Year Published |
Supports Use |
Is the dose and regimen consistent with the protocol? |
Comments |
Phase II trials |
Spencer et al. 2007 |
Yes |
No |
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each treatment cycle with filgrastim 5 mcg/kg/day (VGF) given on days 2 to 7 and either day 9 or 10 until the ANC was 10 x 109/L, every 21 days for 4 cycles |
|
Papageorgiou et al. 2005 |
Yes |
No |
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. |
|
Pasricha et al. 2008 |
Yes |
No |
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, dexamethasone 16 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, pegfilgrastim on day 9, every 21 days for 4 cycles |
Guidelines |
Date published/revised |
Supports Use |
Is the dose and regimen consistent with the protocol? |
Comments |
NCCN |
NHL 2016/HL 2015 |
N/A |
N/A |
- |
BCCA |
2016 |
N/A |
N/A |
- |
CCO |
2016 |
N/A |
N/A |
- |
Efficacy
After a median follow up of 44 months, the median [OS] was 12.9 months (range 4-54 months). Three (14%) patients achieved complete remission and eight (36%) patients achieved partial remission accounting for an overall response rate of 50%.r

© European Journal of Haematology 2005
The ORR on an ITT basis was 53% with a 2-year OS of 50%. VGF appeared to have significant efficacy against heavily pretreated NHL and HL.r

© Internal Medicine Journal 2007
However, only 17 (43%) patients proceeded to a subsequent SCT (13 autologous, 4 allogeneic). Patients proceeding to transplantation received a median of 4 cycles of VGF, whereas those not receiving a transplant received a median of only two cycles of VGF (range 1–4). OS at 2 years for those who did or did not proceed to a subsequent transplant procedure was 71% versus 35%, respectively (P = 0.01) (Fig. 2).r
Toxicity
None of the patients died as a result of treatment toxicity and all the treatment was given in a outpatient facility.r

© European Journal of Haematology 2005