The major evidence supporting this protocol is provided by a phase III multicentre international randomised trial (CORAL) involving 396 patients that compared R-ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) with R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine and cisplatin) in patients with relapsed or refractory CD20+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).r
Between July 2003 and September 2007, 202 patients were randomised to receive R-ICE and 194 patients were randomised to receive R-DHAP. Both arms were given every 3 weeks for 3 cycles followed by ASCT and an additional rituximab dose was given on day -1 in the first course of each arm. The primary end point was the mobilization-adjusted response rate after three cycles of chemotherapy. Overall efficacy measurements were similar between R-DHAP and R-ICE with different toxicity profiles.r
Prior to CORAL, Kewalramani et al. were the first to investigate whether the addition of rituximab to the ICE regimen improved the complete remission rates in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL under consideration for ASCT. Thirty-six patients who had not received rituximab previously were treated with R-ICE every 2 weeks for 3 cycles. R-ICE appeared to improve CR rates when compared with historical controls treated with ICE.r
It should be noted that the CORAL study compared two rituximab combination chemotherapy regimens head to head and that there have been no randomised studies to confirm the efficacy of adding rituximab to ICE in this patient population.
Efficacy
In the CORAL study, the 3-year EFS rate was 31% (95% CI, 26% to 36%) and was not significantly different between the R-ICE and R-DHAP arms (26% and 35%, respectively; P=0.6). Three-year PFS was 37% (95% CI, 31% to 42%), and the R-ICE and R-DHAP arms were not significantly different (31% and 42%, respectively; P=0 .4). Three-year OS was 49% (95% CI, 43% to 55%), with no difference between the R-ICE and R-DHAP arms (47% and 51%, respectively; P=0.4). For patients who underwent ASCT, 3-year PFS was 53%. There was no difference between the numbers of patients who achieved CR (38%) and PR prior to ASCT. Response rates, PFS and OS were all significantly affected by prior use of rituximab, early relapse (<12 months) and the secondary IPI (prognostic index) (see Table 3 below).r In the earlier, non-randomised study the CR rate with R-ICE was 53% compared with 27% in historical controls treated with ICE (see Table 4 below). The PFS in this group was 54% at 2 years.r


© Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010

© Blood 2004
Toxicity
In the CORAL study, grade 3 to 4 haematologic toxicities were more severe in the R-DHAP arm than the R-ICE arm and included grade 4 renal toxicity in 11 patients.r
In the R-ICE arm 90 serious adverse events occurred in 58 patients, and in the R-DHAP arm 120 serious events occurred in 68 patients. In both arms, the most common serious adverse events were infections, with a similar rate of infection as a result of neutropenia (16%) in both arms.r

© Blood 2004