Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoid malignancy worldwide and its incidence increases with age with approximately 40% of cases occurring in patients over 70 years of age.r r r Retrospective analyses have shown that the outcome of elderly patients is worse than that of younger patients but that some elderly patients do have a complete response to treatment and long-term survival.rrrrrr It is unclear if DLBCL in the elderly is intrinsically different from that in younger patients. There are concerns about the tolerability and efficacy of chemotherapy in the elderly due to the paucity of data in this patient population and the evidence that dose reductions in the treatment of DLBCL affects overall survival.rr There is also greater variability in drug pharmacokinetics in the elderly for example older women have reduced rituximab clearance, resulting in higher serum levels and prolonged exposure times.r The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy in the elderly may offset the potential negative effect of chemotherapy dose reduction, leading to acceptable efficacy and reduced toxicity.rrrr
The evidence supporting this protocol is provided by the only prospective trial in this patient cohort. This study was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study of 150 patients aged over 80 years who had DLBCL between Jan 9, 2006, and Jan 23, 2009. 149 patients were included in the intention-to treat analyses.r
Inclusion criteria
- Patients greater than 80 years with untreated histological proven CD20+ diffuse large B cell lymphoma according to WHO classification
- Ann Arbor stage I bulky to stage IV disease
- Age-adjusted international prognostic index score of 1,2 or 3
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 2 or less Minimum life expectancy of 3 months
- Negative HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus
Exclusion Criteria
- Any other lymphoma subtype
- History of treated or non-treated indolent lymphoma
- CNS or meningeal involvement
- Contraindication to any drug in the chemotherapy regimen
- Serious active disease according to the investigator's decision
- Organ dysfunction: Creatinine greater than 150 umol/L, bilirubin concentration greater than 30 umol/L or transaminases over 2.5 times the maximum normal concentration, unless related to lymphoma
- Neutrophil count less than 1.5x109/L or platelet count less than 100x109/L, unless caused by bone marrow infiltration
- History of cancer during the past 5 years, except non-melanoma skin tumours or stage 0 (insitu) cervical carcinoma
- Treatment with any investigational drug within 30 days before the planned first cycle of chemotherapy
- Under the care of a guardian
All patients received six cycles of rituximab combined with low-dose CHOP (R-miniCHOP) at 3-week intervals. Patients received 375 mg/m2 rituximab, 400 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 25 mg/m2 doxorubicin, and 1 mg vincristine on day 1 of each cycle, and 40 mg/m2 prednisone was given on days 1–5 with no pre-phase prednisone which can be used to improve the performance status reduce toxicity of the first cycle in older patients.r Prevention of tumour lysis syndrome by alkalinisation or hypouricaemic drugs was done if necessary. Antiemetic therapy with 5HT3 antagonists was given at each cycle. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or erythropoietin support was left to the discretion of the treating physician. However, in the event of severe neutropenia or neutropenic fever, subcutaneous G-CSF was recommended from day 6 to 13 of the subsequent cycle or until neutrophils were 1.0 x109/L or more. There was no dose adjustment in the event of haematological toxicity. However, the next R-miniCHOP cycle was postponed until the neutrophil count reached 1.0 x 109/L and the platelet count 100 x 109/L, with a maximum of 28 days between two consecutive cycles. If these counts were not reached within 28 days, treatment was stopped. In the event of grade 2 neurological vincristine-related toxicity (sensory or motor polyneuritis, constipation, or visual or auditory changes) vincristine was discontinued.r
The primary endpoint was overall survival, both unadjusted and adjusted for treatment and baseline prognostic factors. The secondary endpoints were response to treatment; event-free survival, disease-free survival, progression free survival and safety.r
Source |
Study & Year Published |
Supports Use |
Is the dose and regimen consistent with the protocol? |
Comments |
Phase II trials |
Peyarde et al |
Yes |
Yes |
|
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Case series |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Observational studies |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Guidelines |
Date published/revised |
Supports Use |
Is the dose and regimen consistent with the protocol? |
Comments |
NCCN |
Version 4.2023 |
Yes |
Yes |
|
BCCA |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
CCO |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Efficacy
The median age was 83 years (range 80–95). After a median follow-up of 20 months (range 0–45), the median overall survival was 29 months (95% CI 21 to upper limit not reached); 2-year overall survival was 59% (49–67%). In multivariate analyses, overall survival was only affected by a serum albumin concentration of 35 g/L or less (hazard ratio 3.2, 95% CI 1.4–7.1; p=0.0053). Median progression-free survival was 21 months (95% CI 13 to upper limit not reached), with a 2-year progression free survival of 47% (38–56).r Quality of life assessment was not planned in the protocol. Instrumental activities of daily living were used to assess patient ability to tolerate immunochemotherapy but not comprehensive geriatric assessment. In univariate analyses, an impaired IADL score was associated with poor survival, independent from ECOG. Despite the absence of a control arm, this study suggests that in selected patients older than 80 years who have DLBCL and a good performance status, immunochemotherapy with R-miniCHOP offers a good compromise between efficacy and safety.
Figure 1: Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival.r
© The Lancet 2011
Figure 2: Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival. r
© The Lancet 2011
Figure 3: Progression free survial, response at end of treatment and disease-free survial. r
© The Lancet 2011
Toxicity
58 deaths were reported, 33 of which were secondary to lymphoma progression. 12 deaths were attributed to toxicity of the treatment. The most frequent side-effect was haematological toxicity (grade =3 neutropenia in 59 patients; febrile neutropenia in 11 patients).r
Table 1: Association of deaths with treatment during the treatment phase.r
© The Lancet 2011
Table 2: Incidence of non-haematological toxicity by grade and serious adverse events.r
© The Lancet 2011