eviQ is currently updating the way information is presented in the evidence section to improve usability, consistency and facilitate easier update and maintenance. An updated evidence template is being implemented in a staged approach, first across new protocols, then existing protocols as they are reviewed. Find out more
The evidence supporting this protocol is provided by a phase III multicentre international randomised trial TITAN, involving 1,052 patients comparing apalutamide to placebo in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.1
Between December 2015 and July 2017, 525 patients were randomised to receive apalutamide 240 mg once daily and 527 patients were randomised to placebo, both groups received continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or had prior bilateral orchiectomy.
The primary end points were radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were time to the following: initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy, pain progression, chronic opioid use and a skeletal-related event.
A statistically significant improvement was seen in OS and rPFS in patients randomised to receive apalutamide as compared with subjects randomised to receive placebo.
Efficacy
After a median follow up of 22.7 months, rPFS at 24 months was 68.2% in the apalutamide group versus 47.5% in the placebo group (HR= 0.48; 95% CI: 0.39-0.60; P<0.0001). OS at 24 months was 82.4% versus 73.5% for the apalutamide compared to the placebo group (HR= 0.67; 95% CI: 0.51-0.89; P=0.005).1
Kaplan-Meier estimate of rPFS1

© N Engl J Med 2019
Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS1

© N Engl J Med 2019
Time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy 24-month event-free rate was 91% (95% CI: 88-93) in the apalutamide group versus 78% (95% CI: 73-82) in the placebo group (HR= 0.39, P<0.0001). Time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression was 75% versus 36% for the apalutamide and placebo group respectively at 24 months (HR=0.26, 95% CI: 0.21-0.32). Health related quality of life (HR-QOL) data was collected using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire. There was no substantial difference observed in HR-QOL between the apalutamide and placebo groups.1
Toxicity1

© N Engl J Med 2019