eviQ is currently updating the way information is presented in the evidence section to improve usability, consistency and facilitate easier update and maintenance. An updated evidence template is being implemented in a staged approach, first across new protocols, then existing protocols as they are reviewed. Find out more
Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is only possible where sufficient numbers of CD34+ stem cells are available for re-infusion following high-dose therapy. As a consequence, it is important to establish both those factors that predict successful stem cell mobilisation and the optimal regimen for stem cell mobilisation.
A number of factors have been shown to influence mobilisation and stem cell collection including:
- the number of cycles of prior chemotherapy
- the number of prior chemotherapy regimens
- pelvic radiation therapy
- exposure to chemotherapeutic agents that are ‘stem cell toxic’ e.g. melphalan, carmustine
- lenalidomide, although current evidence suggests the effect of prolonged lenalidomide exposure on successful harvest is less than previously thought, and the majority of individuals can be collected with the addition of plerixaforrr
- age (decreasing yield with advancing age)
- platelet count at the time of apheresis (platelet count greater than 200 x 109/L is associated with successful mobilisation).rrrrr
The expert reference panel supported publication of this protocol on the basis of the information summarised in the tables below. The committee was most strongly influenced by a number of studies, including meta-analyses, that demonstrate superiority of cyclophosphamide (CY) + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus G-CSF alone regarding the number of CD34+ stem cells mobilised and the number of apheresis procedures required. Like mobilisation using G-CSF, the CY/G-CSF regimen also allows predictable mobilisation (10-14 days post treatment).rrrrrrrrr
Whilst the use of CY facilitates increased stem cell collection and reduces the risk of collection failure, it does prolong the collection process and increase the risk of infectious complications including febrile neutropenia. There is no evidence of cyclophosphamide impacting the overall transplant outcome, irrespective of dose. Utilisation of additional chemotherapeutic does not appear to be superior to CY aloner. There is a suggestion in the era of novel agent induction that the use of CY vs G-CSF alone may impair engraftment, but further confirmatory studies are needed.rr
Evidence for cyclophosphamide dosage
A number of studies have compared the effectiveness (measured in terms of the likelihood of achieving sufficient CD34+ stem cells for a single or tandem ASCT) and toxicity of high-dose (7 g/m2), intermediate-dose (3 to 4 g/m2) and low-dose (1.2 to 2 g/m2) cyclophosphamide.rrrr
The results of these studies suggest that intermediate-dose (3 to 4 g/m2) cyclophosphamide is as effective as high-dose (7 g/m2) cyclophosphamide but is associated with less clinical toxicity.rrr While lower doses of cyclophosphamide (1.2 to 2 g/m2) may be associated with less toxicity and fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia, data regarding the efficacy of stem cell mobilisation with lower doses of cyclophosphamide is less clear, with some studies suggesting equivalent effectiveness in mobilisation, while a number of studies suggest that lower doses of cyclophosphamide may yield lower numbers of CD34+ stem cells and require more apheresis procedures. The expert committee agrees that any intermediate dose of CY is appropriate (e.g. 3-4 g/m2) and that lower doses may be more appropriate in certain populationrrrr
Evidence level (NHMRC) |
Study
(Author/ref nos.) |
Study design |
Disease |
Is the mobilisation regimen* consistent with the protocol? |
Comments |
I |
Luo et al.r |
Meta-analysis |
MM and NHL |
Variable doses utilised |
|
III-2 |
Hiwase et al.r |
Retrospective cohort |
MM |
CY 3-4 g/m2 + G-CSF |
Compared vs CY 1-2 g/m2 |
III-2 |
Hamadani et al.r |
Retrospective cohort |
MM |
CY 3-4 g/m2 + G-CSF |
Compared vs CY 1.5 g/m2 |
III-2 |
Alegre et al.r |
Retrospective cohort |
MM |
CY 4 g/m2 + G-CSF |
Compared vs G-CSF alone |
III-2 |
Jantunen et al.r |
Retrospective cohort |
MM |
CY 4 g/m2 + G-CSF |
Compared vs CY 1.2-2 g/m2 |
III-2 |
Gojo et al.r |
Prospective, non-randomised |
MM |
CY 4.5 g/m2 + G-CSF |
Compared vs CY + etoposide |
III-1 |
Silvennoinen et al.r |
Prospective, randomised |
MM |
CY 2 g/m2 + G-CSF |
Compared vs G-CSF alone |
III-2 |
Fitoussi et al.r |
Retrospective cohort |
MM |
CY 4 g/m2 + G-CSF/GM-CSF |
Compared vs CY 7 g/m2 |
III-1 |
Narayanasami et al.r |
Prospective, randomised |
NHL and HL |
CY 5 g/m2 + G-CSF |
Compared vs G-CSF alone |
* Chemotherapy ONLY; MM - multiple myeloma; NHL - non-Hodgkin lymphoma; HL - Hodgkin lymphoma
Efficacy
Study |
No. of patients |
Median CD34+ cell yield (x106kg) |
Median no. of apheresis |
% pts obtaining sufficient CD34+ for ASCT |
% pts proceeding to ASCT |
Median days to neutrophil engraftment |
Median days to platelet engraftment |
No. pts graft failure
|
Hiwase et al.r |
CY 3-4 g/m2 |
26 |
7.71 |
1 |
92 |
92 |
16 |
24 |
0 |
CY 1-2 g/m2 |
61 |
5.17 |
1 |
89 |
85 |
14 |
19 |
0 |
Hamadani et al.r |
CY 3-4 g/m2 |
55 |
16 (day 1) |
2.2 |
100 |
100 |
10 |
17 |
0 |
CY 1.5 g/m2 |
68 |
4 (day 1) |
2.5 |
94 |
100 |
14 |
18 |
0 |
Alegre et al.r |
CY 4 g/m2 |
18 |
6.8 |
5 |
100 |
NR |
12 |
11 |
0 |
Jantunen et al.r |
CY 4 g/m2 |
32 |
4.8 |
NR (84% achieved 2x106/kg after 1 apheresis) |
100 |
100 |
11 |
11.5 |
0 |
Gojo et al.r |
CY 4.5 g/m2 |
28 |
21.38 |
1 |
86 |
100 |
11.5 |
14 |
0 |
Silvennoinen et al.r |
CY 2 g/m2 |
34 |
6.7 |
1 |
94 |
NR |
14 |
12 |
0 |
Fitoussi et al.r |
CY 4 g/m2 |
42 |
13.4 |
3 |
93 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
Narayanasami et al.r |
CY 5 g/m2 |
24 |
7.2 |
1 |
96 |
100 |
11 |
13 |
0 |
ASCT - autologous stem cell transplant; CY - cyclophosphamide; NR - not reported
Toxicity
Study |
% febrile neutropenia |
% anaemia requiring RBC transfusion/therapy* |
% thrombocytopenia requiring platelet transfusion* |
% infection* |
Hiwase et al.r |
CY 3-4 g/m2 |
13 |
19 |
3 |
38 |
CY 1-2 g/m2 |
8 |
11 |
1.6 |
13 |
Hamadani et al.r |
CY 3-4 g/m2 |
16.3 |
34.5 |
21.8 |
16.3 |
CY 1.5 g/m2 |
5.8 |
8.8 |
2.9 |
7.3 |
Alegre et al.r |
CY 4 g/m2 |
11 |
27.7 |
33.3 |
11 |
Jantunen et al.r |
CY 4 g/m2 |
72 |
53 |
34 |
72 |
Gojo et al.r |
CY 4.5 g/m2 |
25 |
NR |
NR |
25 |
Silvennoinen et al.r |
CY 2 g/m2 |
90 (during ASCT) |
NR |
NR |
NR |
Fitoussi et al.r |
CY 4 g/m2 |
16.7 |
52.4 |
26.2 |
16.7 |
Narayanasami et al.r |
CY 5 g/m2 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
*Studies did not differentiate between numbers in mobilisation vs numbers in subsequent ASCT; RBC - red blood cell