eviQ is currently updating the way information is presented in the evidence section to improve usability, consistency and facilitate easier update and maintenance. An updated evidence template is being implemented in a staged approach, first across new protocols, then existing protocols as they are reviewed. Find out more
A search of the literature did not find strong evidence to support the use of cabazitaxel and carboplatin treatment in prostate cancer. The expert reference panel supported publication of the protocol on the basis of the information summarised below indicated for a subset of patients with metastatic aggressive variant type prostate cancer (AVPC).
The phase I - II, open label, randomised controlled trial by Corn et al aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel alone compared to cabazitaxel with carboplatin in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Furthermore, they aimed to investigate the hypothesis that patients with clinical or molecular features of the aggressive variant prostate cancer molecular signature (AVPC-MS) would benefit more from the addition of carboplatin.r
AVPC-MS was defined as a molecular signature of combined tumour suppressor defects (>1 alteration in TP53, RB1 and/or PTEN). Aggressive variant prostate cancer clinicopathological criteria (AVPC-C) was defined as patients with at least one of the following 7 clinical features:
- histological evidence of small-cell prostate carcinoma
- exclusively visceral metastases
- predominantly lytic bone metastases
- bulky (>5 cm) lymphadenopathy or primary tumour with Gleason score of 8 or more at diagnosis
- low PSA (<10 ng/mL) plus high volume (≥20) bone metastases at initial presentation, before start of androgen deprivation therapy, or at symptomatic progression in the castrate setting
- elevated (two times or more the institutional ULN) lactate dehydrogenase or carcinoembryonic antigen,
- short interval response (<6 months) to androgen deprivation therapy.
Between August 2012 and May 2015, 160 patients were randomised to either cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 OR cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 4 every 21 days continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal; up to a maximum of 10 cycles. All patients received prednisone 10 mg daily and growth factor support.
The primary outcome was investigator assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of PSA response (defined as a ≥50% decline from baseline); association of change in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urine n-telopeptides with response, overall survival; safety and toxicity and the effect of the aggressive variant prostate cancer on response to treatment.r
Source |
Study and Year Published |
Supports Use
|
Is the dose and regimen consistent with the protocol?
|
Comments |
Phase II trials |
Corn et al, 2019r |
Yes |
No |
Phase I trial - to determine maximum dose
Phase II trial - carboplatin + cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 improved PFS in overall study population versus cabazitaxel monotherapy
|
Guidelines |
Date Published |
Supports Use |
Is the dose and regimen consistent with the protocol? |
Comments |
NCCN |
2024 |
Yes |
Yes |
cabazitaxel dose 20 mg/m2 every 21 days, carboplatin 4 AUC |
BCCA |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
- |
CCO |
2022 |
No |
N/A |
- |
ESMO |
2020 |
No |
N/A |
- |
Efficacy
Summary of evidence
Outcome |
Corn et al, 2019r |
|
Cabazitaxel and Carboplatin (n=81) |
Cabazitaxel (n=79) |
Median follow up (months) |
31 |
31 |
Median PFS (months) |
7.3 (95% CI 3.5 -5.7)
[HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p=0.018]
|
4.5 (95% CI 5.5-8.2)
[HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95, p=0.018]
|
Median OS (months) |
18.5 * (95% CI 16.7-21.9)
[HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.63-1.25, p=0.5]
|
17.3 * (95% CI 13.8-21.9)
[HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.63-1.25, p=0.5]
|
PSA concentrations decline of greater than fifty percent (%) |
61.7
[OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.25-5.10, p=0.016]
|
40.9
[OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.25-5.10, p=0.016]
|
*Not statistically significant
Kaplan-Meier A) PFS B) OS in intent-to-treat (ITT) population r

© Lancet Oncol 2019
Prespecified subgroup analysis showed that the combination favoured those meeting AVPC-C criteria (HR 0·58, 0·37–0·89, p=0·013), but tests for interaction were not significant in the intention-to-treat population.
In pre-planned subgroup analysis, men with AVPC-MS-positive tumours had a median PFS of 1·7 months (95% CI 1·3 to NA) when treated with cabazitaxel versus 7·5 months (95% CI 4·4–9·6) when treated with the combination (p=0·017) and an estimated median OS of 8·5 months (4·8 to NA) versus 20·2 months (13·3–37·2, p=0·0002).
Conversely, men with AVPC-MS-negative tumours treated with cabazitaxel had an estimated median PFS of 6·3 months (5·9–10·9) versus 6·5 months (3·9–8·4; p=0·38) for the combination and an estimated median OS of 21·7 months (95% CI 17·4 to NA) versus 21·5 months (9·1 to NA; p=0·702).
Toxicity
Treatment was generally well tolerated. There was a higher incidence of grade 3-4 fatigue (16% vs 9%), anaemia, (23% vs 4%), neutropenia (16% vs 4%) and thrombocytopenia (14% vs 1%) in the combination group. There were no treatment-related deaths. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in eight (10%) patients treated with cabazitaxel and ten (12%) in the combination group.
Adverse Eventsr

© Lancet Oncol 2019