Breast cancer (all ATM pathogenic variant carriers)
Breast cancer risk should be formally assessed using a validated risk prediction tool such as CanRisk opens in a new tab or window. These tools can be used to estimate 5- and 10-year breast cancer risks for women with a family history of breast cancer and can help personalise screening recommendations for ATM pathogenic variant carriers. Additionally, it is important to note that the risk prediction tool CanRisk has only been validated for truncating ATM variants. CanRisk thus has a potential to underestimate the risk associated with the ATM c.7271T>G pathogenic variant, and as such is not recommended in this scenario.
Surgical
Risk-reducing mastectomy is not recommended for women at moderate lifetime risk of breast cancer. Consider risk-reducing mastectomy for ATM pathogenic variant carriers assessed as high lifetime risk of breast cancer.
Surveillance
Breast screening is generally recommended when the 5-year risk exceeds the 5-year risk for a woman at age 50 years (i.e. 5 year risk greater than 1%), when population screening with mammography commences.r This occurs at age 40 years for women with ATM gene pathogenic variants and no strong family history.r Annual mammography is both cost effective and clinically effective in reducing breast cancer predicted mortality.r
Surveillance plans should be individualised for women with ATM pathogenic variants where a validated risk prediction tool (CanRisk) places them at high lifetime risk and should include annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or mammogram (MMG).
Risk reducing medication
Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERM), such as tamoxifen and raloxifene, have been shown to reduce the risk of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in women identified to be at increased risk. Pathogenic variants in ATM are associated with an increased risk of ER positive breast cancer.rr In a meta-analysis, SERM reduced breast cancer incidence by 38% (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.56–0.69) compared with placebo in women at increased risk with the risk reduction extending beyond the treatment period.r
To date studies have not included enough ATM pathogenic variant carriers to determine if it is effective for primary prevention in this population.
As with all interventions, discussion of risks and benefits should occur. See COSA – Medications to lower the risk of breast cancer: clinician guide. opens in a new tab or window
Additional breast cancer management (ATM c.7271T>G carriers only)
At the present time, and while there is no specific evidence related to ATM (c.7271T>G) pathogenic variant carriers, these guidelines are based on those that apply to the management of breast cancer risk in female BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers
Surgical
Consider bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy for ATM c.7271T>G pathogenic variant carriers. Bilateral risk reducing mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk by at least 90% (depending on the operation performed) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers.r Statistically significant survival benefit associated with bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy compared with surveillance is yet to be demonstrated.
Surveillance
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred screening technique due to its high sensitivity compared with mammogram (MMG) or ultrasound (US). The addition of MMG is limited and does not lead to a significant increase in sensitivity compared with MRI alone.r There is no added value of US or clinical breast exam in women undergoing MRI for screening.r MRI detects tumours which are smaller and more likely to be node-negative than MMG. MRI has a recall rate (requiring further investigation and/or biopsy) of 15% for initial screening, which decreases with subsequent rounds of screening to <10%.
Pancreatic cancer (all ATM pathogenic variant carriers)
One recently published screening study of patients at high risk of developing pancreatic cancer (including patients with ATM pathogenic variants and a family history of pancreatic cancer) found that most screen-detected pancreatic cancers were stage I with favourable long-term outcomes compared with unscreened populations.r
If surveillance is offered it should be undertaken in an experienced high-volume centre after detailed discussion regarding limitations of screening including cost, high incidence of benign or indeterminate pancreatic abnormalities and uncertainties about the benefit. Most small cystic lesions found on screening will not warrant biopsy, surgical resection, or any other intervention.
Prostate cancer (all ATM pathogenic variant carriers)
There is currently no evidence of efficacy of prostate cancer screening in ATM pathogenic variant carriers.
Radiation therapy (all ATM pathogenic variant carriers)
There are mixed reports regarding the effects of radiation on heterozygous ATM pathogenic variant carriers. However, radiation therapy at conventional doses is not contraindicated in ATM pathogenic variant heterozygous carriers and should be considered and delivered if required clinically.rr